Search for: "Richard v. Secretary of State"
Results 161 - 180
of 713
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
See Edelman v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:00 am
The High Court’s decision in Serdar Mohammed v Secretary of State for Defence (2015) further stretched the ECHR’s reach to Afghanistan. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 7:46 am
However, in a concurring opinion in Bush v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am
Ruiz, Jr. was the first Hispanic attorney to argue before the United States Supreme Court in Buck v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
Richards' filing in Broome County did not sit well with Dekar and his Rochester-based lawyers who quickly filed a motion to change the venue to Monroe County Supreme Court under BCL 1112 and LLC Law 702 based on the office location designated in the organizational documents on file with the Secretary of State. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
Yesterday the US Supreme Court, on a narrow 5-4 majority, ordered the state of California to reduce prison crowding because of inadequate medical care in a case style Brown v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:52 pm
The majority vote for Secretary of Defense is scheduled for 4:30 pm EST. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
At paragraph 49 of his judgment, the learned judge cited Lord Bingham’s much repeated observations as to the purposes of an “Article 2 investigation” in the leading case of R (Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Department.[7] These purposes include bringing the facts to light, exposing discreditable conduct or dangerous practices, and providing some degree of comfort to the deceased’s relative by ensuring that lessons are learnt from… [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:17 pm
In June 2008, Michigan Secretary of State Terri Lynn Land, invoking the provisions of M.C.L. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:46 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 7:10 pm
Vance Spath, begins the morning’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
In a remarkable turn in United States v. al-Nashiri, military judge Col. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:05 am
” At The Daily Beast, Ronald Goldfarb argues that the 1967 case United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:59 am
Aynes, “Bradwell v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
Youngstown and United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 3:44 pm
For the State Department list, which can be found on the State Department website and in the Federal Register, see here. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
Secretary of Health and Human Services; Clark v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm
The Court of Appeal rejected the argument of the Secretary of the State that Parliament by the 2007 Act had taken a policy decision to place the Upper Tribunal wholly beyond the reach of judicial review. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:43 am
Rather, United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am
As mentioned above, on Thursday 20 June 2024 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) handed down a unanimous judgment in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Styen J handed down judgement in the case of Prospect v Evans [2024] EWHC 1533 (KB). [read post]
