Search for: "Robert F. End, individual"
Results 161 - 180
of 754
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2010, 8:43 am
Robert Wood Johnson Univ. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 2:48 pm
Stickan and Henry F. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 2:48 pm
Stickan and Henry F. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:58 am
–Michael F. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 7:23 am
Robert Wienstein. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am
First, Judge Thacker asserts that “[r]eading § 1182(f) as bestowing upon the President blanket authority to carry out a suspension of entry, which involves rejecting a particular country’s immigrant visa applications as a matter of course, would effectively nullify the protections in § 1152(a)(1)(A) and create an end-run around its prohibitions against discrimination” (p. 145). [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 1:12 pm
Forrester, 512 F.2d 500 (U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 1:44 pm
The officer’s resignation does not relieve him of liability if he acquired the opportunity before his employment ended. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 6:14 pm
nw=0 [https://perma.cc/3KNK-C88E] (archived Sept. 17, 2021); Nicholas Wright, How Artificial Intelligence Will Reshape the Global Order, FOREIGN AFFAIRS (July 10, 2018) https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2018-07-10/how-artificial-intelligence- will-reshape-global-order [https://perma.cc/4C5U-HQZ7] (archived Sept. 17, 2021); Robert F. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:46 am
The Decision The current version suspends entry from certain individuals from Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen.[2] Each country has varying degrees of suspension, meaning some countries are banned as immigrants and nonimmigrants, while others are just banned as immigrants but with multiple exceptions.[3] In a 5-4 decision, Chief Justice Roberts reasoned that the President lawfully exercised his power under §1182(f) of the Aliens… [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:46 am
The Decision The current version suspends entry from certain individuals from Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen.[2] Each country has varying degrees of suspension, meaning some countries are banned as immigrants and nonimmigrants, while others are just banned as immigrants but with multiple exceptions.[3] In a 5-4 decision, Chief Justice Roberts reasoned that the President lawfully exercised his power under §1182(f) of the Aliens… [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:06 pm
In 1964, frustrated by their inability to travel together to visit their families in Virginia, Mildred Loving wrote in protest to Attorney General Robert F. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
Sweany: The Court held that when an individual commits first degree arson by “knowingly and maliciously . . . [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
” The individuals continue to deny any involvement or complicity in the leak whatsoever. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
In his plurality decision, then-Justice Lewis F. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:22 am
Individuals and families will merely be invited to compare costs and outcomes. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:27 pm
Wittes, joined by University of Texas law professor Robert M. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am
In the larger scheme of things, do you think such cases are as important as, if not more so than, the banner headline cases involving individual rights? [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:04 pm
In fact, Justice Scalia once stated that the average applicant for an individual Corps permit “spends 788 days and $271,596 in completing the process. [read post]
Takeaways From the Facebook Threat and Title VII Head Scarf Cases Handed Down by the Court This Week
3 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Elauf’s behalf, alleging that A&F had violated Title VII, which prohibits an employer from deciding not to hire an individual because of the individual’s religious observance or practice, unless the accommodating the observance or practice would create an undue hardship for the employer. [read post]
