Search for: "Roper v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2020, 3:35 pm
To date, though the pandemic is a global health and economic phenomenon, the pandemic-related securities litigation activity has been limited to the United States. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:55 pm
But it is nothing like a guarantee that the court will agree to hear it.On the other hand, the question of whether life without parole for juveniles is constitutional is the logical next step following the court's 2005 decision in Roper v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 8:41 am
The eighteen cases are, in chronological order, United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Roper, 14-6873, which asks (1) whether an actual conflict of interest meets the “interests of justice” standard established in Martel v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am
Roper, 14-6873. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Ct. 2842 (2007)...............................................................60 Roper v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
In 2008, the Sixth Circuit found in Phelps-Roper v Strickland (22 August 2008) that a similar law to those struck down this year was valid. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 10:49 am
The decision in State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
Ct. 2705, 2724 (2010) (describing Cohen as involving punishment based on “the offensive content” of the speaker’s profane message); United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
California, Roper v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:18 pm
" Twice in recent years the United States Supreme Court has affirmed the constitutionality of JLWOP for murder cases, first in the Roper v Simmons decision in 2005, then in 2010's Graham v Florida decision. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
Roper, 14-6873, a capital case that asks (1) whether an actual conflict of interest meets the “interests of justice” standard established in Martel v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
United States, 14-29, a case seeking to clarify several standards regarding insider trading. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:13 am
"In 2005, in Roper v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:15 am
Keep in mind that before State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 3:15 pm
In 2005, the United States Supreme Court held in the case Roper v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:25 am
As we concluded in Roper with respect to the juvenile death penalty, "the United States now stands alone in a world that has turned its face against" life without parole for juvenile nonhomicide offenders.The State’s amici stress that no international legal agreement that is binding on the United States prohibits life without parole for juvenile offenders and thus urge us to ignore the international consensus. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Obama, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:28 am
Rev. 743, 752-53 (2005); see also, e.g., United States v. [read post]
