Search for: "Rosalind English"
Results 161 - 180
of 207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am
February 24, 2011 Matthew Flinn When eviction breaches human rights February 23, 2011 Adam Wagner Football “rioter” Garry Mann loses Euro human rights appeal February 23, 2011 Adam Wagner A stormy week for European human rights – The Roundup February 21, 2011 Melina Padron “British soldiers go to hell” and free speech February 21, 2011 Isabel McArdle Prisoners not entitled to compensation for voting ban February 19, 2011 Rosalind… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
See Rosalind English’s post. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
And don’t forget our recent posts… Another former MP jailed for expenses offences February 10, 2011 Adam Wagner Prisoner votes: a ping pong ball in a wind tunnel February 10, 2011 Adam Wagner No right for prisoner to wear Easter lily February 10, 20111 Crown Office Row “Socialism in a single clause”: Public sector equality duty seminar February 10, 2011 1 Crown Office Row Justice in the age of insecurity February 9, 2011Adam Wagner It’s time we packed… [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 4:31 am
” We look at the vote, what the government could do now and the reality of ‘thinking the unthinkable’ and come out of The European Convention and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights Listen to the podcast *** Useful links: Carl Gardner’s blog post: MPs vote on prisoners’ votes: how to square the circle Rosalind English of 1 Crown Office Row writing in The Guardian: Withdrawal from the European court of human rights is not a legal … [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:19 am
The issue has also generated a wider debate over the place of the European Court of Human Rights, which at the very least is interesting from a constitutional perspective, and as Rosalind English pointed out yesterday raises some valid questions for both supporters and detractors of the European Convention. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:46 am
Withdrawal from the European court of human rights is not a legal problem Rosalind English in The Guardian: Criticisms of the Policy Exchange report distracts from legitimate points made in a political debate masquerading as a legal one An analysis of the The European Convention and the ECHR from an experienced lawyer…well worth reading. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
It would be wrong in principle to devalue what was in their best interests by something for which they could in no way be held to be responsible. [41], [44] Lord Kerr stated that the fact that a child is a British citizen also has an independent value, freestanding of the debate in relation to best interests, and this must weigh in the balance in any decision that may affect where a child may live. [46] – [47] Update – Rosalind English’s analysis is here. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:30 am
Rosalind English. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:58 am
” Rosalind English, writing on the UK Human Right Blog, expressed the view that: “This judgment has serious practical implications not just for publication cases but for any civil case not covered by legal aid, and although the ruling is only binding on the government, not on the courts, the potential for its immediate domestic impact cannot be ignored. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 12:10 am
The astonishingly energetic UK Human Rights Blog had a swiftly posted and informative piece, followed today by an interesting and thoughtful piece by Rosalind English entitled “Costs Regime in Peril after Strasbourg Court Ruling” in which she concludes The Campbell ruling will lend ballast to the Jackson recommendations that for all civil litigation – not just media cases – we should return to a system where success fees and ATE premiums are not… [read post]
“Blackmail” costs system violated Daily Mirror’s freedom of expression rights in Naomi Campbell case
18 Jan 2011, 7:20 am
Rosalind English’s analysis of the decision is here. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 2:05 am
Last week Rosalind English posted on the case of the “Ratcliffe 20? [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 10:54 pm
While quite a few members of 1 Crown Office Row are involved in the blog and post regularly – and Rosalind English and Angus McCullough QC are editors with Adam Wagner (Pictured), Adam Wagner seems to be tireless in his coverage of the important human rights issues of our times – and long may that continue. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm
Rosalind English analyses the implications of the High Court’s decision. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:45 pm
You can read Rosalind English’s analysis of the decision here Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts Analysis: Cigarette vending machine ban was lawful Analysis: Pet shock collar ban – barking, or a new era for rights? [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:50 pm
Read judgment Update, 26 November – Rosalind English’s case comment is here The following report is based on the press summary provided by the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 3:00 am
The future of meat Electric shock pet collar ban did not breach human rights Court rules on injunctions against animal rights protesters Rosalind English’s comment on the Countryside Alliance foxhunting ban case [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:39 am
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Read more Court rules on injunctions against animal rights protesters Rosalind English’s comment on the Countryside Alliance foxhunting ban case UK Human Rights Blog shortlisted for JUSTICE Human Rights Award 2010 [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 2:20 am
And don’t forget our posts… New EU Bill seeks to enshrine British sovereignty November 12, 2010 Rosalind English Will mediation save the justice system? [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 10:51 pm
The UK Human Rights blog from 1 Crown Office Row is an excellent resource for lawyers and non-lawyers…Rosalind English has shed a bit more light on the Woolas case and has come up with some serious ‘food for thought’. [read post]
