Search for: "Roth v. Roth"
Results 161 - 180
of 808
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2019, 3:58 am
” In an op-ed for USA Today, Gabe Roth calls on the court to release information about “which justices … are voting to grant review in the major cases the court is taking,” such as the recently granted abortion case June Medical Services v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:39 am
” Roth v Ostrer 2018 NY Slip Op 03218 [161 AD3d 433] May 3, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department presents a different, and somewhat rare take on the question of “strategy” v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 8:06 pm
Roth won in State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
Courts of Appeal after Blakely v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
Huynh v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:00 am
§ 78p (West 2011); Roth v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 11:25 am
Roth[Affirmed; Stegall; September 25, 2020]Failure to allow defense argumentProsecutorial error in closing argumentImproper admission of law witness opinion testimonyImproper weighing of aggravating and mitigating factors at sentencingNovember 1--Friday--a.m.State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:49 am
Roth, 69 AD3d 912, 893 NYS2d 605 [2d Dept., 2010]). [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
V. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 3:36 pm
Cir. 2002); Otto Roth & Co. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
The Court found that Regulation 3 does not carry the force of law (see Weiss v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 11:06 am
Roth won in State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 5:00 am
In the case of Oberdorf v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm
Roth sees something suspect about the court’s decision to issue opinions today. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:21 am
Supreme Court, Bd. of Regents v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
Roth and Alexander R. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 8:18 am
Roth and Alexander R. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
Defendant’s assertion that he was reviewing the invoices is too general to defeat the claim (see Schulte Roth & Zabel, LLP v Kassover, 80 AD3d 500, 501 [1st Dept 2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 702 [2 [read post]
