Search for: "Roy v. AT" Results 161 - 180 of 1,709
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal ‘Blue’ Suburban Moms Are Mobilizing to Counter Conservatives in Fights Over Masks, Book Bans and Diversity Education Washington Post – Annie Gowan | Published: 2/9/2022 Dozens of suburban moms from around the country dialed into an Ohio-based Zoom training session with the same goal – to learn how to combat the increasingly vitriolic rhetoric from parents whose protests over mask mandates and diversity education have turned school board meeting rooms… [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
On 28 January 2022 Warby LJ refused permission to appeal in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 12:50 pm by Tom Kosakowski
Once elected, directors will serve a full term from April 2022 – April 2025 [Original emphasis and internal links to members-only pages omitted.]Here are the nominees along links to any information published on the Ombuds Blog:2021–2024 Director TermSuzanne Diviney, CO-OP, Vice President, Office of the Ombuds Lead, Pfizer Inc.Thomas Griffin, Ombudsperson, UCLA Health and Health Sciences, University of California, Los AngelesJennifer Mahony, Ombuds Office Director, Boston Children's… [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:36 pm by fjhinojosa
Kastenberg, The Limits of Executive Power in Crisis in the Early Republic: Martin v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Chip Roy (R-Tex.), have built a bipartisan coalition around the issue spanning the ideological spectrum after several stock-trading controversies during the pandemic raised eyebrows. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Twenty-one states and the District of Columbia had significant tax changes take effect on January 1, 2022 Five states (Arizona, Arkansas, Louisiana, North Carolina, and Oklahoma) cut individual income taxes effective January 1. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Some people are getting this priceless protection, and others are not, with little justification for the different treatment but just because they drew a judge who is more open to pseudonymity or because the judge found their plight to be specially sympathetic. [1] See Hundtofte v. [read post]