Search for: "Rush v. Department of State" Results 161 - 180 of 462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
As stated in the motion it is clear that the Department of Corrections "botched" two of the five mock executions, a 40% error rate. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
As stated in the motion it is clear that the Department of Corrections "botched" two of the five mock executions, a 40% error rate. [read post]
9 Jan 2006, 4:42 pm
In 1973, the Supreme Court attempted to define obscenity in Miller v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court’s reluctance to take up new cases on volatile social issues is putting it on a collision course with President Donald Trump, whose Justice Department is trying to rush such disputes through the appeals system to get them before the nine justices as quickly as possible. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:37 am by Rosalind English
Nor was it legitimate to promote the public law duty of the school, not giving rise to a private law action, to a duty under section 6 of the HRA remediable by a claim in damages (R (Holub) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 1 WLR 1359 at 1367). [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 10:01 pm by Anthony Gaughan
But amid the chaotic rush to get the commissions out, some inadvertently remained behind on a desk in the State Department. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 10:02 am by John Floyd
  Within this due process safeguard (made applicable to the states by the Fourteen Amendment), the “right to remain silent” was born in 1966 in Miranda v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]