Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 161 - 180
of 68,623
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am
Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:01 am
[D.] [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:17 pm
In El Puente v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
As Civil Procedure professors, we were intrigued by the Court’s disposition of E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:10 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 2:34 pm
This was the case in SnapRays, d/b/a SnapPower v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
SCARFE J.P., R. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:43 am
See Adolph v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:50 am
D’Aubigny v Khan & Anor. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
But in any event, I thought I'd mention what's going on here. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
As the subject of ownership and provenance are paramount to the Center for Art Law’s mission, having dominated court dockets as leading art law disputes, the following is intended as a survey of the most highlighted categories of looted art. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
Russell (finding that different penalties for similar amounts of crack and cocaine violated Minnesota’s Equal Protection Clause); Ravin v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:58 am
Peugh et al. v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 12:29 pm
Possible Implications If SFO prevails, they’d be able to reinforce the strength of their trademark and set a precedent about how geographic locations can be used for branding and source identification. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:44 am
It will get the benefit of the court’s “heavy presumption” that it’s true, even if it’s not. [read post]
5 May 2024, 4:00 am
Pour éviter toute demande de remise pouvant découler de la lecture de la déclaration de la victime, il serait préférable que le juge, en vertu de l’article 722 (2) C.Cr. et de son obligation de vérifier si une telle déclaration est ou sera déposée, s’assure que celle-ci est remise aux parties avant de fixer l’audience sur la peine. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:33 pm
See Louisiana Wetlands, LLC v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:02 am
One point of difficulty here is the Supreme Court’s precedent in Walden v. [read post]
