Search for: "SANTANA V. STATE"
Results 161 - 180
of 202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2016, 3:57 am
United States ex rel Rigsby, which involves the effect on a lawsuit under the False Claims Act of a violation of the act’s seal requirement, and Lynch v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
Young, 13-95 (asking whether a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 12:15 pm
Past participles like “owed” are routinely used as adjectives to describe the present state of a thing. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 3:22 pm
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
INS (2001), and United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:47 am
Hellerstedt, the Justices simply denied review on Tuesday of two other cases by states seeking to defend similar laws: a Mississippi case, Currier v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
Santana in 2006, essential allegations are generally determined by the statute defining the crime. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:15 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 pm
Denn 15-1234Issue: Whether a state's interest in “increas[ing] . . . information concerning those who support the candidates,” Buckley v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Young 13-95Issue: (1) Whether the state forfeits an argument that Stone v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 10:27 am
Santana supra at 212-213; See, Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
S. ___, ___ (2017) (slip op., at 9) (quoting United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1269; and Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 6:53 am
Cruz Santana, No. 03 CV 6299(JG), 2005 WL 67094, at *8 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
Again, this opinion is valid only for the State of Massachusetts and not Utah. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am
” Lluch v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am
A federal court in New York refused to dismiss his race discrimination claims, find that the disparate assignments and discipline supported an inference of bias (Santana v City of Ithaca). [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:29 pm
United States, Romer v. [read post]
