Search for: "SMITH V US" Results 161 - 180 of 9,369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
 In Corbyn v Millett [2021] EWCA Civ 657, the Court of Appeal provided useful commentary on the issue of ‘bare comment’. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
The case is the most significant elections matter the justices have been forced to confront since the Bush v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
 Even apart from that fundamental flaw, however, this first “off-ramp” argument wouldn’t withstand scrutiny on its own terms, even if this were a case (again:  it’s not) where a state were purporting to “enforce” Section 3 by, for example, refusing to allow the winner of an election to enter into state office because she’s disqualified under Section 3, or using a state-law-sanctioned cause of action to remove such a person from the… [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 11:19 am by Norman L. Eisen
In December, Smith asked for 21 days between the Court granting cert and oral argument (per the U.S. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
Nonetheless, Smith v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
The consultation focuses on the size of the services covered and what uses are being targeted. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
”   Both clauses use a “catch-all” term, but they differ slightly from one another in terms of their prepositions—a difference to which Trump would attach great significance. [read post]