Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF H. W." Results 161 - 180 of 1,312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2021, 12:13 pm by Unknown
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:57 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The specific question before the Court is “[w]hether the U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 1:23 pm by Alex Vivona, Sam Cohen
Taiwan’s Defense Ministry reported that the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) sent 117 sorties in September and 196 sorties in October, including J-16 jet fighters, H-6 strategic bombers and Y-8 submarine-spotting aircraft. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Ryan Amelio
”[20] OSHA in the 1991 Standard relied on its reasoning from the 1978 Occupational Exposure to Lead Final Standard (the “1978 Standard”) where it rejected biological testing of workers as a means of monitoring employer compliance with occupational lead exposure limits.[21] In the 1978 Standard, OSHA concluded that “[a]ttempting to compel workers to subject themselves to detailed medical examinations presents the possibility of clashes with legitimate privacy and religious… [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
There is a reason, after all, that presidential swing states like Wisconsin and Pennsylvania have competitive statewide elections even as their statehouses are gerrymandered into permanent Republican legislative majorities representing a minority of the voters. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
"[1] And if the party witness is not telling the truth, "there is certainly a countervailing public interest in knowing the [witness's] identity. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 7:47 am by fjhinojosa
Beyer is quoted in the following article: Stephanie H. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:20 pm by Emily Dai
In session III, Cameron Kerry, Brookings Ann R. and Andrew H. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
In so ordering, Judge Kacsmaryk broke with long-standing precedent cautioning judicial deference to the political branches in matters implicating foreign affairs and seemed to subordinate the Executive’s interest in controlling such matters to Statesinterests in immigration enforcement. [read post]