Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF M. C., ET AL."
Results 161 - 180
of 523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Fraternité des policiers et policières de Montréal c. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Il résulte de cette admission, de même que des explications données par l’appelant relativement au paiement de l’amende, qu’il n’a consigné aucun plaidoyer avant de payer la totalité du montant réclamé (art. 166 al. 2 C.p.p.). [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 1:01 am
Irion, “A Special Regard: The Court of Justice and the Fundamental Rights to Privacy and Data Protection”, in Faber et al (eds.) [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
ZAYAS, JJ. 2018-03024 (Index No. 3841/17) In the Matter of Lawrence Union Free School District, petitioner/cross respondent, vNew York State Public Employment Relations Board, respondent/cross petitioner, et al., respondent. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
ZAYAS, JJ. 2018-03024 (Index No. 3841/17) In the Matter of Lawrence Union Free School District, petitioner/cross respondent, vNew York State Public Employment Relations Board, respondent/cross petitioner, et al., respondent. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
That challenge arrays the premises and ideology of the state and the state system against two alternatives. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
I am happy to announce the publication of my article: "A Lex Mercatoria for Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Without the State? [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 9:26 am
From a legal perspective, the new company is typically organized as either a C-corporation or as a limited liability company (“LLC”). [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the… [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 8:43 am
Cynthia Harvey, et al. v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 6:00 am
Sánchez-Cordero Dávila, Jorge A., et al. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
ZAYAS, JJ. 2018-03024 (Index No. 3841/17) In the Matter of Lawrence Union Free School District, petitioner/cross respondent, v New York State Public Employment Relations Board, respondent/cross petitioner, et al., respondent. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
ZAYAS, JJ. 2018-03024 (Index No. 3841/17) In the Matter of Lawrence Union Free School District, petitioner/cross respondent, v New York State Public Employment Relations Board, respondent/cross petitioner, et al., respondent. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
The officers that would perform SFSTs in the new generation of studies were not reluctant draftees, but volunteers7, SFST instructors8, or exhibited "genuine interest in the study and eagerness to be selected. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:15 pm
I have a section in this paper I'm working on --designed to be a love letter of sorts between retributive justice and liberal democracy :-) -- that I'm afraid I'm not sure is fully there yet, and I was wondering if those with a political philosophy bent might have some reactions. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 6:55 am
Amicus brief in support of Texas from Babylon Bee et al Amicus briefs in support of NetChoice/CCIA preliminary injunction motion Chamber of Progress et al EFF RCFP et al TechFreedom Texas response. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Gulf Restoration Network, et al v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
Cuomo, & c., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
Cuomo, & c., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm
Or b/c the 1A does and should extend only to thick autonomy interests? [read post]
