Search for: "STATE OF LOUISIANA IN THE INTEREST OF A. N."
Results 161 - 180
of 381
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2017, 12:23 pm
As Kean Miller previously reported, earlier this year the Louisiana Legislature passed Act 278, which eliminated the requirement to prove PC&N as an entry requirement to obtaining authority from the LPSC to become an approved “common carrier” of waste within the state. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
The adoption of the CAT, therefore, was—and remains—a matter of significant controversy, as well as the subject of considerable interest for policymakers and tax economists. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm
Administrator Pruitt further determined that the waiver is in the public interest. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
Finally, “embarrass” means “to cause to experience a state of self-conscious distress. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm
The Irish State could be facing millions in claims for damages from citizens if public bodies illegally process their personal information. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
The mortgagee controlled the mineral lessees’ ability to alienate their interest in the Lease by requiring the mineral lessees to obtain the mortgagee’s written consent to release the Lease.[15] Based on these reasons, the Second Circuit held that the trial court correctly found the mortgagee solidarily liable with the mineral lessees for damages under the Louisiana Mineral Code.[16] In its reasoning, the Court referenced Louisiana Civil Code article 1979,… [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
The mortgagee controlled the mineral lessees’ ability to alienate their interest in the Lease by requiring the mineral lessees to obtain the mortgagee’s written consent to release the Lease.[15] Based on these reasons, the Second Circuit held that the trial court correctly found the mortgagee solidarily liable with the mineral lessees for damages under the Louisiana Mineral Code.[16] In its reasoning, the Court referenced Louisiana Civil Code article 1979,… [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
The mortgagee controlled the mineral lessees’ ability to alienate their interest in the Lease by requiring the mineral lessees to obtain the mortgagee’s written consent to release the Lease.[15] Based on these reasons, the Second Circuit held that the trial court correctly found the mortgagee solidarily liable with the mineral lessees for damages under the Louisiana Mineral Code.[16] In its reasoning, the Court referenced Louisiana Civil Code article 1979,… [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
The mortgagee controlled the mineral lessees’ ability to alienate their interest in the Lease by requiring the mineral lessees to obtain the mortgagee’s written consent to release the Lease.[15] Based on these reasons, the Second Circuit held that the trial court correctly found the mortgagee solidarily liable with the mineral lessees for damages under the Louisiana Mineral Code.[16] In its reasoning, the Court referenced Louisiana Civil Code article 1979,… [read post]
25 May 2017, 7:44 am
The court stated that "[n]o other artist or record company could take market share from Paisley Park Enterprises by discovering the contents of the disputed recordings. [read post]
12 May 2017, 6:00 am
La codificación en México: 1821-1917: una aproximación. [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:47 pm
Louisiana, 391 U. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 11:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 11:38 am
” Before Liskow’s involvement in the case, the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana sided with Suavinex, granting summary judgment in its favor on the basis that its obligation extended only to Luv n’ care’s “proprietary” confidential information, not to products that were sold publicly. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 11:38 am
” Before Liskow’s involvement in the case, the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana sided with Suavinex, granting summary judgment in its favor on the basis that its obligation extended only to Luv n’ care’s “proprietary” confidential information, not to products that were sold publicly. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 11:38 am
” Before Liskow’s involvement in the case, the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana sided with Suavinex, granting summary judgment in its favor on the basis that its obligation extended only to Luv n’ care’s “proprietary” confidential information, not to products that were sold publicly. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 11:38 am
” Before Liskow’s involvement in the case, the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana sided with Suavinex, granting summary judgment in its favor on the basis that its obligation extended only to Luv n’ care’s “proprietary” confidential information, not to products that were sold publicly. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 8:04 am
The amended Rule 147 and the new Rule 147A “are substantially identical, except that . . . new Rule 147A allows an issuer to make offers accessible to out-of-state residents and to be incorporated or organized out-of-state. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 1:20 pm
” Nevertheless, PHH states that “[i]n an abundance of caution and in light of the critical importance of the RESPA issues to PHH and to the entire settlement-services industry…PHH addresses those issues directly [in its brief] to demonstrate that there is no legitimate basis to revisit the panel’s statutory rulings. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 12:54 pm
” Photo by Francisco Macías: Constitución política del Estado Libre de Coahuila y Tejas, sancionada por su Congreso Constituyente en 11 de marzo de 1827, Mexico City: Imprenta de Galván, A Cargo de Mariano Arévalo, https://lccn.loc.gov/ltf91091367 Some of the nuances that we found interesting in the Constitution of Coahuila and Texas are the following: Art. 16. [read post]
