Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. S.D."
Results 161 - 180
of 198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2010, 2:11 am
May 8, 2009) State of New Jersey v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 12:23 am
In State of New Jersey v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
See “Tort Law – Indirect Reliance – New Jersey Supreme Court Rejects Fraud-On-The-Market Theory,” 114 Harv. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 10:51 am
Relying on a recent and directly on point case out of the New Jersey Supreme Court, Rowe v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
Plaintiffs say that defendants should not be allowed to do this because, despite what the statute says, Congress couldn't have meant to authorize pre-service removal before a plaintiff even has an opportunity to effect service.This has been happening a lot in drug/device cases originally filed in New Jersey because: (1) a lot of big drug/device companies have their headquarters in New Jersey, and (2) a lot of plaintiffs' lawyers view New… [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:48 am
Code §§ 22.1-79, 22.1-125; compare New Jersey v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
Feb. 27, 2007) (New Jersey statute); Weiss v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
Supp. 1160, 1168 (S.D. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:08 am
Supp.2d 1026 (S.D. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
What we're doing here is the start, not the end, of relevant research.Also, if you think we didn't get your state right, please let us know. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Where such rulings were broad enough, they tended to create legislative backlash, as happened in New Jersey. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:19 pm
Supp.2d 1329, 1336 (S.D. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:35 am
Now, the federal district court in New Jersey has similarly rejected class certification in two consolidated suits in which state residents argued that DuPont should pay for a medical monitoring program because their drinking water was allegedly contaminated with a Teflon-related chemical. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 1:00 pm
Essentially ignoring two New Jersey Supreme Court decisions (Rowe and Sinclair), the court applies New Jersey law to a case having nothing to do with the state (other than the defendant having shipped the product in question from New Jersey). [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
United States, 179 F.R.D. 291, 294 (S.D. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Mentlik, Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Mentlik, LLP, of Westfield, New Jersey, argued for defendant-appellant, Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
Rost, a physician in the pharmaceutical industry since 1992, was employed by Pharmacia in June 2001 as Vice President in charge of the Endocrine Care Unit in Peapack, New Jersey. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Eastman Kodak Co., 726 A.2d 955 (New Jersey Super. 1999). [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Partnership, 603 N.W.2d 193, 197 n.4 (S.D. 1999); Rupert v. [read post]
