Search for: "STATE TAX COURTS JUDICIAL"
Results 161 - 180
of 5,024
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
United States opinion in the United States Court of Claims, a wilful FBAR Penalty case. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 2:56 pm
Niki Kelly of the Fort Wayne Journal Gazette has a story today on the state judges up for retention by the voters on Nov. 4:Hoosier voters get their chance next month to retain or reject three justices of the Indiana Supreme Court, an Appeals Court jurist and the Tax Court judge who changed Indiana's property tax landscape forever. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 7:11 am
Groups that are on the state court list but not on this list of winningest amici are those like the National Congress of American Indians, Multistate Tax Commission and Reason Foundation, which might have distinct interests in the state subset of cases. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
On Thursday 26 July, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Secretary of State for Justice v MM. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 5:36 pm
Supreme Court has stated: The preclusive effect of a state court judgment in a subsequent federal lawsuit generally is determined by the full faith and credit statute, which provides that state judicial proceedings "shall have the same full faith and credit in every court within the United States . . . . [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:41 am
The New York State Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, First Judicial Department, has publicly censured Gerald A. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 10:15 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas disagreed and granted Trafigura Trading’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:26 am
Recently, in separate cases, the Louisiana Board of Tax Appeals and Louisiana’s First Circuit Court of Appeal (on appeal from a Nineteenth Judicial District ruling in favor of the taxpayer), threw cold water on the Department’s theories, finding that the pricing formulas at issue were appropriate and that the taxpayers paid the appropriate amount of taxes on oil sales. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 5:10 pm
Is any seemingly indirect tax that could be stated as a direct tax thereby forbidden without apportionment? [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
What is of particular interest here is the caveat retained by the Court, in stating, "in the absence of any allegation that it was a sham transaction", the assessee would be entitled to set off the loss. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:30 am
United States, the Supreme Court held that most if not all general authority Treasury regulations carry the force of law and, thus, are eligible for judicial review and deference under the Chevron standard. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:30 am
United States means that tax practitioners must be more sensitive to administrative law and judicial deference to administrative rules. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:25 pm
United States, No. 09-837 (Jan. 11, 2011), the Supreme Court has finally and decisively rejected the notion of tax exceptionalism in judicial review standards. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
” In response, judges need to use the broad latitude that law gives them“to protect the integrity of judicial proceedings, which includes the safety of court personnel, witnesses, and jurors. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:31 am
A state court's handling of Scharnweber's claims that entails references to the fact that Scharnweber might be subjected to a federal tax penalty would not disturb the "congressionally approved balance of federal and state judicial responsibilities. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:15 pm
[Tax Prof Blog] * Navigating the fallibility of the judicial system requires more nuance than Twitter allows. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 8:07 am
Thornton, in which the Supreme Court held that the qualifications for president outlined in the Constitution “are ‘exclusive’ and that States do not have the power to ‘supplement’ them with their own. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 2:50 pm
The Tax Court found that Yakou did not apply. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:38 am
The case raises serious constitutional questions as well practical issues for parents and children, biological, married and non-married.Mary Bonato, of GLAD (the lawyer who argued successfully in the Supreme Judicial Court in 2003 in favor of same sex marriage in Massachusetts, and in the United States Supreme Court in 2015 in favor of same sex marriage across the nation), represents (along with co-counsel) and argued on behalf of Partanen. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:38 am
The case raises serious constitutional questions as well practical issues for parents and children, biological, married and non-married.Mary Bonato, of GLAD (the lawyer who argued successfully in the Supreme Judicial Court in 2003 in favor of same sex marriage in Massachusetts, and in the United States Supreme Court in 2015 in favor of same sex marriage across the nation), represents (along with co-counsel) and argued on behalf of Partanen. [read post]
