Search for: "STATE V. POWERS" Results 161 - 180 of 40,797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2012, 8:58 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix.
On 30 January, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson) will hear the case of PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (formerly VV (Jordan) and PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department). [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:44 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
This is incorrect.First, there is language in Chiafalo v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 3:41 pm by The Federalist Society
The Supreme Court granted certiorari on two questions: (1) Does the Federal Power Act permit FERC to regulate these demand response transactions at all, or does any such rule impinge on the States’ residual authority? [read post]
While the defense argued that the defendants were not guilty of subversion as subverting state power involves the use or threat of force, the court referenced HKSAR v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:03 am by Autumn Callan
Clark [SCOTUSBlog materials] on Monday holding that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) [LII materials] preempts a Kentucky state law that requires a power-of-attorney agreements to expressly grant authority to enter an arbitration agreement. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:38 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
United States rely on the 1876 decision of Chy Lung v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
May (The Free State Foundation) & Andrew Magloughlin (The Free State Foundation) have posted NFIB v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:36 pm by Tarunabh Khaitan
The following are the most important orders given by the Justices Sudershan Reddy and Surinder Singh Nijjar of the Supreme Court in the case of Nandini Sundar v State of Chattisgarh (2011):1. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 10:48 am by Adam Steinman
EMW Women’s Surgical Center, limited to the following question: Whether a state attorney general vested with the power to defend state law should be permitted to intervene after a federal court... [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm
Blake, United States District JudgeHolding: Tort claims based on conduct prior to the execution of a contract are not outside the scope of the agreed to forum selection clauses and that enforcing said clauses, which refer to “any legal action” related to the agreement.Facts: In 2013, Defendant, Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (“Old Dominion”) entered into an Equipment Purchase Agreement (“Alstom Agreement”) with Defendant Alstrom… [read post]
Department of Safety is whether the Congressional war powers under the US constitution allows them to authorize suits against nonconsenting states. [read post]