Search for: "STATE v B J J J" Results 161 - 180 of 6,735
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division's decision in this appeal of a ruling by a New York State Supreme Court is set out below:  Employees Retirement Sys. for the City of Providence v Rohner 2024 NY Slip Op 00674 Decided on February 08, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff
The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
Appeals Criminal Law: Stays; ss.10(b) & 7; s. 24(1) StandingR. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:20 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
State Farm The Maryland Court of Appeals answered this question incorrectly in Stickley v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD J. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD J. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Guest Author
Sweet Home Chapter of Communities, the Court distinguished its previous decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[2]  In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]