Search for: "STATE v BIRD" Results 161 - 180 of 1,274
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2021, 3:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“A violation of Judiciary Law § 487 requires an intent to deceive (see Judiciary Law § 487), whereas a legal malpractice claim is based on negligent conduct” (Moormann v Perini & Hoerger, 65 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]; see Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637 [2018], affd 35 NY3d 173 [2020]). [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:35 am by Unknown
State of Washington (Trust Land; Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Jurisdiction) Western Watersheds Project v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hindsight arguments concerning selection of one of several reasonable courses of action do not state a viable cause of action for malpractice (Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 667 [2017]). [read post]
Babies and children lack legal capacity—and rely on the care of parents, guardians, or the state to survive. [read post]
25 May 2021, 7:20 am by Hayleigh Bosher
 Section V – Copyright enforcement: the technological and cross-border dimensions Section five covers copyright enforcement, in four detailed chapters. [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:45 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
Hindsight arguments concerning selection of one of several reasonable courses of action do not state a viable cause of action for malpractice (Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 667 [2017]). [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hindsight arguments concerning selection of one of several reasonable courses of action do not state a viable cause of action for malpractice (Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 667 [2017]). [read post]