Search for: "STATE v J C E"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
Specifically, the Court detaches RFRA from cases like United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:08 pm
This posting was written by E. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
Their collective view was that shape element (A) fell foul of Article 3(1)(e)(i) and shape elements (B) and (C) fell foul of Article 3(1)(e)(ii), but that neither Article 3(1)(e)(i) nor (ii) applied to all of (A), (B) and (C) together. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:27 pm
Apple Inc., Docket 15-777, J. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
Millar(1972), 1972 CanLII 950 (BC SC), 33 D.L.R. (3d) 288 (B.C.S.C.), Berger J. stated, at p. 314: A classical theory that once was unchallengeable must yield to the facts of modern life. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:00 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm
United States 3)Magwood v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 12:42 pm
C. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
Unfortunately for them, Arnold J found that the research did not separate the results into the relevant class, that the sector was dominated by a small number of vehicle rental companies and that, until Europcar adopted the e-moving logo, Enterprise was the only company in the sector which used a lower case 'e' logo on a green background.The SurveysArnold J then introduced the surveys. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa Co., supra (Opala, J., dissenting) (emphasis in original).Gerhart v. [read post]
19 May 2018, 2:38 pm
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
This point could be inferred from the reasoning of the Advocate General and the CJEU in Case C-205/13 Hauck GmbH & Co KG v Stokke A/S, which indicated that an important purpose of Article 3(1)(e)(iii) of the Trade Marks Directive was to prevent the use of indefinite trade marks protection to extend the time-limited protection of other intellectual property rights. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm
Addressing the e-waste crisis: the need for comprehensive federal e-waste regulation within the United States. 14 Chapman L. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 3:00 am
See State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:42 pm
AstraZeneca Pharms. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am
C. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:36 am
In a prior ruling, the court held that Craigslist qualified for Section 230(c)(1) protection for state law claims but not for the 1595 claim. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Arestis, J. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:27 pm
By Katharine E. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 3:45 am
C-061069, 2007-Ohio-5874, at para. 18. [read post]
