Search for: "STATE v. BRENTS"
Results 161 - 180
of 565
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2019, 3:47 am
United States Postal Service, in which they will consider whether the federal government can challenge patents under the America Invents Act. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am
That would elevate the significance of a school’s requisite attention to its paperwork to “an astonishing level”: R (on the application of S (A Child)) v Brent LBC (2002) EWCA Civ 693, (2002) ELR 556). [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am
For The Wall Street Journal, Brent Kendall and Jess Bravin report that “[t]he Supreme Court on Monday upheld a Virginia law that prohibits uranium mining within the commonwealth’s borders, in a splintered ruling that affirmed the powers of the states to regulate mining on private lands within their territories,” in Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 11:26 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Brent Minard v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:30 pm
The Administration is committed to promoting nuclear power in the United States and developing a safe, long-term solution for the management of used nuclear fuel and nuclear waste. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:59 am
On Friday afternoon, the justices added four cases to their merits docket, including Seila Law v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 3:40 pm
Brent (1972) 6 Cal.3d 784.) [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:24 am
” At OurFuture.org, Sam Pizzigati argues that in Janus v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:21 pm
In Kopczynski v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:31 am
” (slip op. at 23-24) (citing Strickland and United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 2:30 pm
This morning the Court heard argument in Fisher v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
For The Wall Street Journal, Brent Kendall and Jess Bravin report that Husted v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 5:09 am
This question arises from judicial campaign contributions and the escalating expenses of state judicial campaigns and the Supreme Court answered it Monday in Caperton v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:02 am
In Griffin v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
Williams) reported that the Caperton v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:16 am
Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions [2011] EWHC 2616 (Admin) – Read judgment On 13 October 2011 Mr Justice Supperstone in the High Court held that changes to rules for calculating housing benefit were lawful and in particular did not breach equality legislation. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 5:04 pm
” Ketchum v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:17 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Brent Alec Parrish v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
