Search for: "STATE v. FRANCISCO" Results 161 - 180 of 3,743
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2023, 2:09 pm by David Post
[Not the political kind, the real kind, the stuff you get from pigs] The Supreme Court has a pretty interesting, and potentially very important, "dormant commerce clause" case before it this term—National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:33 am by Florian Mueller
Cal.) jury trial in San Francisco for November 6, 2023.This means the trial will be interrupted by the Thanksgiving holiday (November 23), though it is unclear whether the trial will be interrupted for a full week or just a very long weekend.As previously reported, Google already has a huge antitrust trial coming up in the last third of this year: on September 12, the United States et al. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:50 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
He won a case the Supreme Court of the United States in a landmark constitutional law case that upholds civil rights under the First Amendment, Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Krauss, New Light on the History of Free Exercise Exemptions: The Debates in Two Eighteenth-Century State Legislatures, (Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, 2022).Luke Boso, Religious Liberty, Discriminatory Intent, and the Status Quo Constitution, (Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper , Jan. 2023).Enrico Bonadio, Krishna Ravi Srinivas, Balaji Parthasarathy Iyengar & Atreya Choudhary, Gandhian Philosophy and Indian Intellectual Property,… [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 9:23 pm by Florian Mueller
Its in-house adjudicative proceeding does not prevent the merger from closing.This is the order on the motion to stay and the next deadlines and hearing dates:DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]