Search for: "STATE v. MUNOZ" Results 161 - 180 of 199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm by MOTP
Munoz, Hockema & Reed, L.L.P., 22 S.W.3d 857, 864 (Tex. 2000). [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 10:25 am
(See Scheiding v Dinwiddie Constr. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
This is a group effort of a number of attorneys – John Gihon, Marshall Cohen, Roberta Cooper, Kathleen Schulman, Mariana Munoz-Parsons and myself. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
This is a group effort of a number of attorneys – John Gihon, Marshall Cohen, Roberta Cooper, Kathleen Schulman, Mariana Munoz-Parsons and myself. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:23 pm by Amy Howe
Washington, in which the justices will consider whether a plaintiff must pursue all available administrative remedies through the state to be eligible to bring a federal civil rights claim; and Department of State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Generally, a process server’s affidavit of service establishes a prime facie case as to the method of service and, therefore, gives rise to a presumption of proper serviceIn Matter of Reyes v Munoz, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 5226157 (Mem), 2021 N.Y. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 6:22 am by Richard Hunt
Sapp and Sturgill and their client Maribel Munoz have covered a larger area. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:48 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Lots of proponents of the use of drones in warfare tout fewer pilots put at risk in dangerous missions, but what about the financial cost of drones v. manned aircraft? [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 12:54 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Sir Peter Lane (sitting as a Judge in the High Court) heard the appeal and defendant’s application in the case of Secretary of State for Education v Marples  KA-2024-000095. [read post]
7 Apr 2025, 10:33 am by Dr. Adam Feldman
Her recent vote in Department of State v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated… [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
The judge ruled for both the claim of the Plaintiff and the counterclaim of the Defendant and denied any damages to either party. _______________________________________________________ In another June 2023 decision in Munoz v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Munoz-Ortenza, No. 07-51344 Defendant's sentence for illegal reentry into the U.S. is vacated, where Cal. [read post]