Search for: "STATE v. VIDAL"
Results 161 - 180
of 255
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2017, 1:59 am
This confirms and arguably extends the present position under the Data Protection Act 1998 following the “striking down” of section 13(2) by the Court of Appeal in the Vidal Hall case. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 7:36 pm
Pérez-Giménez, a federal district court judge in the District of Puerto Rico, made headlines by granting the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico’s motion to dismiss in Conde-Vidal v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:58 am
Google’s appeal in Vidal-Hall is pending before the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:05 am
TBL Licensing v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 5:24 am
The bill is in committee in the State Senate. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
The case, Vidal v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am
Vidal v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:18 am
Supreme Court just announced that it will weigh in on this case, Vidal v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 2:52 am
Vidal, No. 04-50185 (10-10-07)(en banc). [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am
However, such an approach would have potentially been problematic as, unlike in Vidal-Hall v Google [2015] EWCA 311 (where the Court of Appeal disapplied section 13(2) of the DPA), there was no real discrepancy between the EU parent legislation (Directive 95/46/EC/the Data Protection Directive) and the domestic legislation. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
Vidal that is focused on the mark “TRUMP TOO SMALL. [read post]
Arthrex on Remand: Commissioner of Patents Drew Hirshfeld and the Problem of Shadow Acting Officials
24 Mar 2022, 4:39 pm
(My colleague Rebecca Eisenberg and I have criticized United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 9:28 am
As demonstrated in the Georgia Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Vidal v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 9:28 am
As demonstrated in the Georgia Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Vidal v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 9:28 am
As demonstrated in the Georgia Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Vidal v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 8:56 am
(d) AFP v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 3:46 am
It was argued that there had to be some damage which was limited to distress or hurt to feelings, which could be proved before damages were awarded, citing Vidal-Hall v Google Inc. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 7:50 am
And looked to United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 2:18 am
The Court found that the instance in question could be viewed as falling within the margin of appreciation accorded to member states: ‘the choice of the means calculated to secure compliance with article 8 of the Convention in the sphere of the relations of individuals between themselves is in principle a matter that falls within the contracting states’ margin of appreciation’, referencing the Grand Chamber in Bărbulescu v Romania ([125]). [read post]
