Search for: "STONE v. HOLDER" Results 161 - 180 of 183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2009, 6:50 am
 French ‘3 strikes’ law now legal (Ars Technica) (IP Watch)   Germany Denic softens its registration rules (IPKat)   Sweden Pirate Bay founders banned from running the site (TorrentFreak) Fresh Pirate Bay purchase attempt by four potential buyers (TorrentFreak)   United Kingdom ISP threatens legal action against UK over anti-piracy plans (TorrentFreak) UK to introduce three strikes policy (Michael Geist) (Electronic Frontier Foundation)… [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:50 am
French '3 strikes' law now legal (Ars Technica) (IP Watch) Germany Denic softens its registration rules (IPKat) Sweden Pirate Bay founders banned from running the site (TorrentFreak) Fresh Pirate Bay purchase attempt by four potential buyers (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom ISP threatens legal action against UK over anti-piracy plans (TorrentFreak) UK to introduce three strikes policy (Michael Geist) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) United States US General Facebook for scientists gets… [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:50 am
French '3 strikes' law now legal (Ars Technica) (IP Watch) Germany Denic softens its registration rules (IPKat) Sweden Pirate Bay founders banned from running the site (TorrentFreak) Fresh Pirate Bay purchase attempt by four potential buyers (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom ISP threatens legal action against UK over anti-piracy plans (TorrentFreak) UK to introduce three strikes policy (Michael Geist) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) United States US General Facebook for scientists gets… [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:45 pm
In fact, Rolling Stone released a list in an October 2008 article titled "Stop Using My Song Republicans! [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:52 pm
In a recent case this month, Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:30 am
If a corporate dissolution contest could be re-imagined as a TV game show, I'd call the case of Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:10 pm
Sticks and stone may break my bones, but misleading emails alone don't really hurt anyone. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 6:58 pm
In particular, might they interpret the "good faith" qualifier in the uncorporation statutory waiver provisions as similar to corporate-type good faith, which has been interpreted as part of the fiduciary duty of loyalty (see Stone v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:37 pm
The very best traditions of the local small firm, a foundation stone of the community. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]