Search for: "Sacks v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 565
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2012, 8:52 am
United States. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:15 pm
In Knight v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 5:59 am
This is one of them.The case is PMB v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:43 am
With the Court set to hear arguments this week in two of the Term’s most anticipated cases – United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 7:08 am
Wright, 778 So 2d 352 (Fla 2d DCA 2001); Sack v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:30 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:30 am
E, Moritz v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:19 am
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:00 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 2:30 pm
The Court cited United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Because the claim was not based on protections granted by the AWCPA but on protections in the Copyright Act generally covering pictorial works, the plaintiff had stated a valid claim.To read Judges Leval, Sack, and Hall's decision, click here. www.dunnington.com Copyright law, fine art and navigating the courts. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:46 am
Citing a Second Circuit case from 1977 as well as cases from the Seventh and Ninth Circuits, the Court of Appeals (Pooler, Sack and Park) notes that "an amended complaint ordinarily supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 11:57 am
Supreme Court in the case of Sheetz v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:32 am
The Court of Appeals has upheld the verdict.The case is Southerland v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 2:25 am
Sacks, John L. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:43 am
United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 7:03 am
Briefly Mike Sacks at First One @ First discusses the prospect that the Court will grant cert. in Fisher v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 7:14 am
This means that if the federal judges (who interpret the Constitution every day) know in their heart of hearts that the defendant did not get a fair trial, they have to sustain the conviction if "fairminded jurists could disagree" about the state court's proper application of constitutional precedent.The case is Matthews v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:53 am
SC Johnson & Son v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:46 am
Racky Ramchair certainly did.The case is Ramchair v. [read post]
