Search for: "Said v. Clinton"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,163
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2020, 7:51 am
Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 10:22 am
As the Supreme Court noted in Rosenberg v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 1:19 pm
It looked all but certain that Hillary Clinton would replace him. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
FEC v. [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm
United States Tulsi Gabbard, a U.S. congresswoman from Hawaii, dropped a defamation lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, according to a court filing. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am
Trump v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:58 pm
Today, Douglas Letter argued Trump v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm
There is a long history, she asserted, of Congress’ obtaining records from presidents, and the Supreme Court has said that such subpoenas are valid as long as there is a “conceivable legislative purpose” and the “records are relevant to that purpose. [read post]
12 May 2020, 10:11 am
Washington and Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am
David SchwartzNext week, in Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
” As I’ve said elsewhere, the kids aren’t asking for a Cadillac, or even a beat-up Kia. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 12:05 pm
Washington and Colorado v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:49 am
Dist. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 11:59 am
The Clinton administration eventually ratified the treaty on behalf of the United States in 1993, after receiving the advice and consent of the Senate. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 8:30 am
Congress was free to reject Florida’s electors, regardless of what the Supreme Court said. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:59 pm
MacElree v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 7:56 am
” Second, in Clinton v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm
EconoTimes had a piece “Hillary Clinton says Gabbard defamation suit a bid to silence critics and make headlines”. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 3:36 pm
This is not a K-Mart "blue light special"State v. [read post]