Search for: "Schmitt v. Schmitt"
Results 161 - 180
of 225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2010, 4:20 am
”The Commissioner rejected Beauchamp’s appeal commenting that “it is clear that a teacher who severs his or her service with a district, through retirement or resignation, no longer has recall rights pursuant to Education Law §§2510 and 3013” [citations omitted].Further, said the Commissioner, “[A]bsent a showing of fraud, duress, coercion, or other affirmative misconduct on the part of school officials which renders a resignation involuntary, a resignation… [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 7:30 am
At Forbes, law professor Richard Epstein defends originalism against Souter’s tacit critique, arguing that Souter’s alternative method of constitutional interpretation indefensibly portrays Plessy v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:33 am
(That would be a mistaken characterization, in my view, but a tempting one, and I don’t mean necessarily mean Posner and Vermeule, but Carl Schmitt’s direct intellectual heirs and students in Europe.) [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 6:22 pm
(This is, by the way, a distinctly legal issue, by contrast to the best-v-worst observations made about the economics of optimal and unoptimal currency zones.) [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:28 am
Rumsfeld, Hamdan v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:00 pm
As Michael Schmitt, the Director of the Tallinn Manual project admits, this difference in interpretation is where that manual departs from Mr. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:35 am
Schmitt, 694 So.2d 145, 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
Ill. 1981) (rejecting First Amendment arguments and enjoining Democratic candidates from using the acronym "REP," as in "Vote REP April 7," as shorthand for the Representation for Every Person Party, a name seemingly chosen precisely to deceive voters into thinking that the candidates were Republicans); Schmitt v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 8:46 am
” That is, it is judges themselves who have recognized, over the past seventy-five years or so since the seminal case of Crowell v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:08 am
Although the IDF receives legal advice on planned operations, including targeting with air-delivered munitions—as noted in this paper by Mike Schmitt and J.J. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:30 am
” This in turn triggered vigorous disagreement from several other legal experts, including Professors Kevin Jon Heller, Michael Schmitt, and Ryan Goodman. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
PCAOB, Seila Law v. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 8:59 am
” In re Marriage of Schmitt, 321 Ill. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 3:46 pm
See, e.g., Burton v. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 6:39 am
” In re Marriage of Schmitt, 391 Ill. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:21 am
l al-fiqh / by Ihsan Abdul-Wajid Bagby. 1986 v, 244 leaves ; 28 cm. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:41 pm
" Chiafalo v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 4:46 am
(American history, that is to say -- in contrast with their "retail[ing] a kinder, gentler Carl Schmitt," which if done expressly is not the most optimal way to secure prominent billing in the Times.) [read post]
