Search for: "Schneider v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court takes up Flowers v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "Absent fraud, collusion, malicious acts, or other special circumstances, an attorney is not liable to third parties, for harm caused by professional negligence, unless there is a relationship sufficiently approaching privity between the attorney and the alleged client Schneider v Finman 15 NY3d 306 309 (2010)). [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 12:02 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Reported Blakinger:“The Court finds that the State has engaged in bad faith litigation tactics,” Wright wrote in an one-page order signed Aug. 23. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am by Marissa Miller
Joe Schneider of Bloomberg News discusses the upcoming case of Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:25 pm by John A. Emmons
  Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith examined the legal efficacy of the U.S. government prosecuting entities owned by foreign states, in the context of Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 9:11 am by Benjamin Pollard
Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s decision in Egbert v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 4:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The allegation that Mid City lost the opportunity to pursue an administrative appeal, without any indication that the appeal would be successful, is insufficient to state a claim (see Coccia v Liotti, 70 AD3d 747, 754). [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Wade shook the 2022 election” by Elena Schneider and Holly Otterbein (Politico) for Yahoo News North Carolina: “N.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hillman,  write the following: "In a significant decision this summer, Schneider v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” The third case granted on Friday was United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:59 am by Anna Salvatore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]