Search for: "Scott Dodson" Results 161 - 180 of 185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2008, 4:56 am
Scott Dodson has authored several guest posts for us, including posts on Twombly you can find here and here. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 7:51 am
Additionally, I'm excited to welcome for the first time Adam Winkler from UCLA, who will share some wisdom about con law and specifically the issues related to the Heller guns case; Erik Knutsen, a torts and insurance scholar from Queen's University (Canada); and Scott Dodson, a civ pro scholar from UArk-Fayetteville. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 5:42 am
The Colloquy had published two previous pieces on the Bowles case in prior months, including one by Professor Scott Dodson (University of Arkansas School of Law), see here, and one by Elizabeth Burch (Cumberland School of Law), see here. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 9:23 am
Scott Dodson at University of Arkansas Law gave his students the chance to undo that momentous decision in this final exam. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 2:22 pm
In response to Scott Dodson’s piece on Bowles v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 7:47 pm
Continuing his trend of timely writing on recent Supreme Court decisions, Scott Dodson (University of Arkansas School of Law) has written a short piece for the Northwestern University Colloquy entitled “Jurisdictionality and Bowles v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 10:51 pm
Here is the abstract:This short piece, written for the Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, responds to Professor Scott Dodson's comment on Bowles v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 10:42 pm
Scott Dodson (University of Arkansas - School of Law) has posted Jurisdictionality and Bowles V. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 7:45 am
Professor Scott Dodson (University of Arkansas School of Law) has written a case comment on one of the most important cases from October Term 2006: Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 9:45 pm
Twombly": Law Professor Scott Dodson has this essay online at Virginia Law Review In Brief. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 3:44 pm
Professor Scott Dodson analyzes the impact of the Court's opinion in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 3:17 pm
Daniel Sokol Civil procedure expert Scott Dodson of the University of Arkansas - School of Law weighs in on Twombly in the most recent onlime compansion to the Virginia Law Review. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 1:13 am
Scott Dodson (University of Arkansas - School of Law) has posted Pleading Standards after Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 9:33 pm
Professor Scott Dodson has just posted an Essay to the Virginia Law Review's "In Brief" page that offers some thoughts on the recent case of Bell Atlantic, Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
In April we announced a new scholarship roundup providing a community update on articles placed in the spring cycle. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Scott Dodson, In Search of Removal Jurisdiction, Northw [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 3:10 pm
" Commentators mused about Twombly's impact: our own Marty Lederman queried here whether Twombly "signal[ed] the rejection of notice pleading" altogether, Scott Dodson raised the prospect that "the Court [was] saying that Rule 8 requires ‘notice-plus' pleading"; and Michael Dorf described a "rough consensus" "that there's no way to understand the decision if it doesn't apply a… [read post]
24 May 2007, 7:16 am
See also Scott Dodson's reading here. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:42 pm
Twombly, making it more difficult for private plaintiffs to file antitrust claims against large companies; Professor Scott Dodson weighs in here at Civil Procedure Prof Blog; at Volokh Conspiracy, Einer Elhauge has these thoughts; Patti Waldmeir of the Financial Times has this story; in the Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports here (subscription req'd); and Peter Lattman has this post at the WSJ.com Law Blog. [read post]