Search for: "Scott v. Clark" Results 161 - 180 of 264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2013, 11:44 pm by Jeff Gamso
Over at Popehat, Clark wrote "Edward Snowden, F____ yeah!" [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:51 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 11:13 am by Jonathan H. Adler
For the second time this week, a federal court has rejected the EPA's effort to delay an Obama Administration rule.Today, in Air Alliance Houston v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am by Alan Neff
The lawyers are Robert Cheeley, Kenneth Chesebro, Jeffrey Clark, Matthew DePerno, John Eastman, Jenna Ellis, Michael Farina, Rudy Giuliani, Julia Haller, Scott Hagerstrom, Brandon Johnson, Stephanie Juntilla, Christopher M. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
On 13 March, Julian Huppert MP asked the justice secretary Kenneth Clarke about protection for academics and scientists in its draft defamation bill. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 5:40 pm
Propellant (APCP) litigation (Tripoli Rocketry Association and National Association of Rocketry v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:14 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Press 2008); Charles Lane, The Day Freedom Died: The Colfax Massacre, the Supreme Court, and the Betrayal of Reconstruction (Henry Holt & Company 2008); and United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
Scott Drug Co., 537 N.W.2d 208 (Mich. 1995), the plaintiff had gotten multiple prescriptions from different doctors for the defendant's drug, and had also been buying it on the street. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2013), Aetna, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 11:06 pm by Adam Wagner
In reality, Ken Clarke will be well aware that the Bloody Sunday Inquiry cannot be taken as a typical example of a modern public inquiry. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:32 am by Scott Bomboy
Scott Bomboy is editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post Grant Blog) CAFC: Analogous art test as the new structure for non-obviousness determinations: In re Klein (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) CAFC vacates preliminary injunction where District Court applied incorrect claim construction: Kimberly-Clark v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  In a separate opinion (with which I agree) Lady Clark rejects an argument that there are insufficient relevant averments of any loss suffered by the pursuer (HC). [read post]