Search for: "Scott v. Superior Court"
Results 161 - 180
of 539
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2017, 5:03 am
Rampant differences among the named plaintiffs and the opt-in plaintiffs led the Court to conclude that plaintiffs could not satisfy the predominance and superiority requirements of Rule 23(b). [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:14 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit decided in Hively v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
In the first, Scott v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 8:50 am
In Goers v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 11:14 am
In the unpublished opinion State of Arizona v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm
However, where the issue of the superior right of possession can be determined separately from title issues, the justice court has jurisdiction to decide the case. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 12:23 pm
Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1004, 1038-1039 (Brinker).)Slip op., at 1. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:33 pm
Superior Court Analysis Highest and Best Use and Jury vs. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:33 pm
Superior Court Analysis Highest and Best Use and Jury vs. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:33 pm
Superior Court Analysis Highest and Best Use and Jury vs. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 12:00 am
The California Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Brinker Restaurant v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 5:54 am
Scott, September 28, 2016, Martin, B.). [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:39 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Superior Courtof New Jersey – Appellate Division: Roberts v. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 2:57 pm
When the Supreme Court of Canada describes in R v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
In Vermont, Superior Court Judge David Howard held the state’s revenge porn law unconstitutional. following on the unconstitutionality of Arizona’s law and the governor of Rhode Island’s veto of its law because it was unconstitutional. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 1:00 pm
Several superior court cases involving this type of situation—most recently, State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 1:00 pm
Several superior court cases involving this type of situation—most recently, State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 12:51 pm
Stephen Dinan of the Washington Times reports that this issue stems a 2001 court decision in Zadvydas v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 1:15 pm
I’m delighted to report that the Michigan Court of Appeals has just upheld a Twitter parodist’s First Amendment claim in the “badass lawyer” case, Levitt v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:30 am
Because of the lower court's "unassailable" findings on the motion to suppress, the Superior Court's ruling rejecting the claim was not an unreasonable application of the Massiah line of cases. [read post]
