Search for: "Sellers v. Stock*" Results 161 - 180 of 619
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2011, 9:24 am by Eric
* Similarly, “The FTC has consistently maintained that sellers are responsible for their marketers’ telephone calls to solicit purchases of the seller’s goods or services. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 3:24 pm by Giles Peaker
Jones v Southwark should be followed. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
Roederer keeps its bottle while Cava loses its sparkleRoederer v J Garcia Carrion S.A. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 8:05 am by Jason Kilborn
The Court's announcement this morning of its judgment in Merit Management Group v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 5:21 am by John Jascob
As a result of unreliable data, the company had in its inventory too many poor-sellers and too few best-sellers, and retailers were frequently sent the wrong orders. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
.' Hernandez v Marquez   2012 NY Slip Op 31112(U)   April 20, 2012   Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 103531/11  Judge: Joan A. [read post]