Search for: "Server v State" Results 161 - 180 of 2,498
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2022, 11:43 am by Eric Goldman
” Old-school CFAA nerds might recall that this fact pattern largely harks back to the criminal prosecution of United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
AUSTIN — The timeline played the starring role during the opening arguments at the jury trial of the United States v Paul Kruse. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 7:46 am by Catherine Reach
While a firm may protect data on servers, hard drives, and physical files while in the office, transferring these files must also be done in a highly secure manner. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:02 am by Stephanie Pell
” They are able to “come into the United States and rapidly use an internet service provider, come up and do their activities and take that down before a warrant can be issued, before we can actually have surveillance by a civilian authority here in the United States. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 1:29 pm by Thomas James
Thomas James (“The Cokato Copyright Attorney”) explains how Hachette Book Group et al. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 1:29 pm by Thomas James
Thomas James (“The Cokato Copyright Attorney”) explains how Hachette Book Group et al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 11:23 am by Anthony Zaller
  The state has begun to issue citations, which start at $250 per employee, and can increase to $500 per employee. 3. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 3:45 pm by Bennett Cyphers
It has also sold direct access to all of its data from a region, updated daily and uploaded to a government-controlled server, for a more lavish $650,000 per year. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 7:37 am by John Jascob
A process server hand-served the subpoenas on Kwon on behalf of the SEC while he was in New York and emailed copies to the appellants’ counsel.This court found that the method of service under the circumstances was in compliance with the Commission’s rules. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 3:55 am by Peter J. Sluka
In Cupcake v Boomboom (covered here), the plaintiff looked to an operating agreement identifying the members, while defendant relied upon a submission to the State Liquor Authority identifying different members. [read post]