Search for: "Shanks v. Shanks"
Results 161 - 180
of 214
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2010, 8:15 pm
Wyers v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 1:42 pm
Cisson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
Shanks v Unilever Plc & Ors, heard 6-7 Feb 2019. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Shanks v Unilever Plc & Ors, heard 6-7 Feb 2019. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
Shanks v Unilever Plc & Ors, heard 6-7 Feb 2019. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Shanks v Unilever Plc & Ors, heard 6-7 Feb 2019. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
Shanks v Unilever Plc & Ors, heard 6-7 Feb 2019. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
Dr Titilayo Adebola wrote about the legal saga concerning the novelty of these apples and Articles 10, 20 and 116 of the Basic Regulation.Since the release of the UK Supreme Court's decision in Unilever v Shanks [2019] UKSC 45 (IPKat post here) the mainstream and social media have been awash with hyperbole as to the potential impact of the decision on large employers. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:16 pm
Shank, 500 F.3d 834. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:53 am
Yesterday the Kat commented on Shanks v Unilever, a decision on the meaning of a somewhat obscure passage of statute law relating to the entitlement of an employee inventor to receive compensation where his invention has conferred an outstanding benefit on his employer. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:20 am
The employer’s motion for summary judgment was granted in part (Baldwin v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 8:47 am
KSR v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 9:01 am
Adele Shank, Law Office of S. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:37 am
Cunningham v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
Federal Court Justice Stephen Rares ruled that Google had failed to adhere to its own policies by doing “nothing to prevent Mr Shanks’ hate speech, cyberbullying and harassment” of Barilaro, the Guardian reports. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 12:10 pm
” In re Marriage of Shanks, 758 S.W.2d 506 (Iowa Dec. 12, 2008) (exclamation point in original). [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 5:59 pm
Shank Southern District of Ohio at Dayton NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION OPINIONS OpinionShort Title/District 08a0560n.06 Jack Tyler Engineering Company v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 10:42 am
Jan. 13, 2000); Shanks v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:11 am
Let’s hope he doesn’t get shanked”; m. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
The state of the art defense cases thus provide a well-established body of law, and a reasonably numerous collection of factual analogies for dealing with the knotty question of whether there was insufficient "new" information for the FDA to allow a CBE submission, and thus for the application of preemption.Here are the state-of-the-art cases that we're familiar with in our limited field of drug and medical device product liability litigation:Alaska: Shanks v. [read post]
