Search for: "Shelley v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2011, 9:39 am by Lawrence Solum
In so doing, the Article offers an innovative theoretical approach, providing guidance to key dilemmas that have been left largely unresolved since the landmark Shelley v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm by Editor
Jordan Furlong created a monster of a Blawg Review based on Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, which he hosted on Stem Legal's Law Firm Web Strategy blog. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm by Editor
Jordan Furlong created a monster of a Blawg Review based on Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, which he hosted on Stem Legal's Law Firm Web Strategy blog. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:53 am by azatty
  Rapp was nominated for his excellent work in the mortgage fraud case of the U.S. v Bernadel, et al. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 6:34 am by David Zaring
  And to suggest otherwise, as the COP does, seems to me to be a basic error in the application of the state action doctrine, unless they're arguing that banks are now state actors, via TARP (no way), or that, because of Shelley v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 4:30 am by EEM
The case is assessed in the Human Rights Law Review article, "Rantsev v Cyprus and Russia: The European Court of Human Rights and Trafficking as Slavery. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:47 pm by constitutional lawblogger
It is a concept most ConLawProfs discuss in our courses, focusing on cases such as Shelley v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:11 pm by David Bernstein
(David Bernstein) Over at Cato Unbound, Jason Kuznicki, prompted by V.C. commenters, takes up Shelley v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
”  Slip op. at 23 (quoting Shelley v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 1:22 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Hoadley, No. 101,205 (July 31, 2009); Shelley Kurt Bock; affirming Judge Martin's suppression order under Fourth AmendmentState v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 10:04 am by Joe Koncelik
 (see example below) The Department states this interpretation is supported by a decision issued by the Ohio Supreme Court- Columbus City School District v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:20 pm
The Council is obliged subject to some qualifications that are irrelevant for present purposes, to issue an abatement notice the purpose of which is to prevent the continuation or recurrence of the nuisance where they are satisfied that such a nuisance exists, see R v Carrick District Council ex parte Shelley [1996] Env LR 273. [read post]