Search for: "Shelton v. Shelton"
Results 161 - 180
of 287
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2011, 2:32 pm
On October 12th, the Florida Supreme Court accepted jurisdiction in the case in State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:44 pm
Morrison & Shelton, 91 S.W.3d 921, 924 (Tex. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm
Shelton, 889 S.W.2d 278, 283 (Tex. 1994); see also Rice v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:32 am
” The case is Brown v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:11 pm
Shelton, 990 A.2d 191, 199 (R.I. 2010) (relying on Ornelas to hold that “the voluntariness of an individual’s consent to search is reviewed by this Court de novo”) Hubert v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:12 pm
Little represented himself, pro se, in a post-conviction motion.The opinion is extremely short and quoted below: Rejecting the holding of Shelton v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 8:39 am
") AC32260 - Wiacek Farms, LLC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:53 am
")AC32260 - Wiacek Farms, LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 8:27 pm
In a recent post, I mentioned that the Florida Supreme Court has accepted jurisdiction over the case of State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:41 am
Shelton here. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 1:08 pm
Capozio, 269 Va. 356, 361 (2005) (emphasis added); based on the opposition’s actions “when considered together,” Shelton v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:26 am
The circuit court’s order is based primarily on the reasoning of a recent decision by a United States district judge in Shelton v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 8:56 am
You can see the Florida Supreme Court docket for State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:13 pm
Pomp cited the case of United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
(Shelton v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:38 am
In State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 9:04 pm
Shelton, 2011 Ohio 4408, 2011 Ohio App. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:33 am
That was the allegation in Lounds v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:48 am
[Trask] More on the Shelton decision. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:36 am
Harvey Silverglate celebrates a Florida federal district-court ruling invalidating a state drug law as unconstitutional for lack of a mens rea requirement, but I'm less optimistic than he is that it will have long-term meaning: this is just a single trial judge and, while the U.S. [read post]
