Search for: "Shoe v. Administrator, Va*"
Results 161 - 180
of 285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
Lion Nathan; Health World v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
He recommended topical cream and a special shoe, but did not refer Mrs. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:15 am
Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 4:32 pm
In Wolf v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:29 pm
It may be assumed that today’s Supreme Court (which has deemed consumer welfare to be the lodestone of antitrust enforcement since Reiter v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 3:08 pm
The anti-commandeering doctrine originated in the 1842 Supreme Court case Prigg v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:05 am
This same battle was already fought, and lost, back in the 1980s with Smith v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am
Error and administrative burden in adjudicating parody. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
Mazer v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:13 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Trademark Review and Appraisal Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (China Blawg) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court: TRAB ordered to re-decide TUAN TOURAN review application: Volkswagen Inc v Trademark Review And Appraisal Board Of The State Administration For Industry And Commerce Of The People’s Republic Of China (China Blawg) Just Do It? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Trademark Review and Appraisal Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (China Blawg) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court: TRAB ordered to re-decide TUAN TOURAN review application: Volkswagen Inc v Trademark Review And Appraisal Board Of The State Administration For Industry And Commerce Of The People’s Republic Of China (China Blawg) Just Do It? [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm
If you use 102(b) to let defendants sell things as useful articles but not as sculpture, then you get lots of administrative costs.Responding to Star Athletica v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(IP finance) Argentina Federal Civil and Commercial Court of Appeals of Buenos Aires orders Cueros Del Norte to stop using Puma’s ‘inverted pipe’ design for sports shoes (IP tango) Australia Virgin unsuccessful in opposition to ALL DAY, EVERY DAY, LOW registration by Qantas (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Speeding up procedure: IP Australia announces additional reforms (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Australia’s innovation patent system provides… [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In Groff v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
That case, Cutter v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:04 am
Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:04 am
Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc. [read post]
