Search for: "Simpson v. Ins*" Results 161 - 180 of 748
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2010, 9:56 am by Meg Martin
Burke’s dissenting opinion in McCann v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
In the case of O’Reilly v Edgar ([2019] QSC 24) the Supreme Court of Queensland awarded Kelvin O’Reilly, the CEO of a go-kart racing organisation, $270 658.71 in damages, including aggravated damages, for defamatory posts by a Facebook troll. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:03 pm by Christopher G. Hill
  In Travelers Indemnity Co. v Simpson Unlimited, Inc the Court considered the question of what constitutes and “improvement” under this code section. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:29 pm by Garrett Hinck
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck provided a primer on the merits issues in ACLU v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
And, in Dunnes Stores v Ryan [2002] IEHC 61 (5 June 2002), Kearns J in the High Court struck down section 19(6) of the Companies Act, 1990 (also here), which required a company to provide an explanation or make a statement to an officer making inquiries about the company, on the grounds, inter alia, that it infringed the right to silence implied into Article 40.6.1(i) (a right now being relocated to Article 38.1 of the Constitution insofar as it… [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 1:14 pm
The best argument for this view would rely on the Supreme Court's 1991 decision in Simon & Schuster v. [read post]