Search for: "Smith v. General Services Administration"
Results 161 - 180
of 751
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2021, 5:10 am
But Roberts said the city’s policy fell outside of Smith because it was not generally applicable. [read post]
31 May 2021, 6:47 am
Choice of venue rules are mainly utilised for geographical and administrative convenience. [read post]
18 May 2021, 10:25 am
The district court concluded that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (FAAAA) preempted AB 5. [read post]
13 May 2021, 11:56 am
See generally, Principles of Professionalism for Delaware Lawyers. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:00 am
Myers, Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Arconti v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 4:27 pm
Co., 33 F.3d 226 (3d Cir. 1993); Smith v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
Kassie Smith QC, counsel for several retailers seeking damages from Visa and Mastercard, told the tribunal Monday that her Italian clients are entitled to choose English law to govern their lawsuits. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 10:01 pm
Smith (1911). [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:24 am
Governing Law WFS’s terms were subject to general maritime law/Federal law of the US, alternatively, Florida law. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 4:53 am
” So, for example, inadvertent disclosure of the fact that “John Smith’s favorite color is blue” or “the Smith household likes to watch old episodes of Breaking Bad” would allow the Smiths to sue the company that suffered the breach. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 11:21 am
In one case, Little v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Smith English only Environment Environment Environmental justice epidemics Epperson v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 6:00 am
The SCBA General Counsel destroyed all copies of the memo, except for one, which Westrick possessed. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 5:38 am
But this past Friday, an alarmed Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Adam Smith (D-Wash.) sent letters both to Acting Secretary of Defense Miller and to Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley expressing “profound concern[] about reports that the Department is unilaterally seeking to end the dual-hat relationship … without consulting Congress or meeting the conditions required by law. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
And consider the great length and complexity of the Supreme Court of Canada’s reasoning and decision in, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Copyright Royalty Board, 970 F.3d 418 (2020) Illustrates that the increased judicial skepticism of administrative lawmaking may well be coming for certain Copyright Office functions as well. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:31 pm
Smith v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 5:55 pm
Smith, 574 F.2d 988 (9th Cir. 1978)(sodomy). [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 5:30 am
When a Supreme Court decision called Employment Division v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm
I ran the video through the Otter transcription service. [read post]
