Search for: "Smith v. Manning (two Cases)" Results 161 - 180 of 847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
  The trial court decision, a frankly astonishing one, came in the case of Nancy Smith and Joseph Allen, who’d spent fifteen years in prison after being convicted of sexually molesting some children in Lorain in 1994. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:45 pm by Emily
On Monday, December 6, the Ninth Circuit will hear oral arguments in Perry v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
” Thus, the two cases could be said to raise the same or at least very similar issues. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Joshua Matz
  The Justices will then hear oral argument in two cases. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
In a case on the plenary docket, Ramirez v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 11:48 am
To take but one, the guidelines call for two to three years of prison. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:41 pm by Steve Hall
Attorney David Hogg said his client, 40-year-old Jerry Jerome Smith, had his first two sentences reversed. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
Larrabee, 47 Me. 474, 475 (Me. 1860) (separate opinion by Goodenow, J.); Smith v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am by Marissa Miller
” At this blog, Michael Smith provides analysis of the Court’s decision last week in Messerschmidt v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
There are three reasons why I think the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC is wrongly decided. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 4:13 am by INFORRM
” Those words are taken from the 1941 case of Liversidge v Anderson, an English case which many are now digging out and dusting off for its resonance with today’s circumstances. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
The case of King v Victor Parsons & Co [1973] 1 WLR 29 examined the situation where a person acted recklessly “like the man who turns a blind eye” determining that a person who “refrained from further inquiry lest awareness of a risk should prove to be correct, was said to be in the same position as a person who acted knowingly”. [read post]