Search for: "Smith v. Miranda" Results 161 - 180 of 190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
Smith, 10-1115, the state petition in the habeas case out of the Ninth Circuit that has now been relisted eleven times. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
Idaho, 17-425, which involves the admissibility of a statement when an officer questions an in-custody suspect before administering Miranda warnings, later administers the warnings, and then obtains a similar statement. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:30 am by Will Baude
Fred Smith and Aaron Tang, as well as Erwin Chemerinsky and Catherine Fisk, wrote skeptical responses. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Smith, No. 06-3112 In a case addressing the constitutionality of a vehicle impoundment under the Fourth Amendment in circumstances in which there was no standardized policy regarding the impoundment and towing of vehicles, the circuit court rules that the constitutionality of a community caretaking impoundment is judged by directly applying the Fourth Amendment, which protects people against "unreasonable" searches and seizures. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 12:31 pm
People v Smith, 1185, 6273/06, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 7342; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Issue: Whether, under Seminole Tribe v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm by Dorothy
MCGILL, Defendant-Appellee. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Evidence -- Statements of defendant -- Private safety or rescue exception to Miranda rule where suspect is questioned by police officers when the suspect is confronted with a life-threatening medical emergency -- Where officers observed defendant chewing and attempting to swallow several pieces of crack cocaine, tried to stop defendant from swallowing too much of the substance, and asked defendant if he had any more crack cocaine in… [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Heller) “When Precedents Are to Be Honored (If Only Formally)” (analyzing Chief Justice William Rehnquist’s disingenuous reaffirmation of Miranda v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 11, 2008 Dutil v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm by Andrew Stine
Petitioner reiterated that he never waived his Miranda Rights and never gave a statement to any law enforcement officers, including the lead detective. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
Smith decision (a decision that I myself support, though I also support the existence of jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction Religious Freedom Restoration Act statutes). [read post]