Search for: "Smith v. Municipal Court"
Results 161 - 180
of 352
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2007, 5:29 pm
Smith v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm
Stated otherwise, the duty imposed upon a municipality when it undertakes to act in loco parentis is nondelegable (see Bartels v County of Westchester, 76 AD2d 517, 523). [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:54 am
Lepis, supra, 83 N.J. at 158; see also Smith v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 12:40 pm
See BCS Services, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Smith v Kunkel16 is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Smith v Kunkel16 is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 12:11 am
John Smith NASSAU COUNTYCriminal PracticeDefendant Granted Trial Order of Dismissal; Prosecutor's Information Fails to Name 'Victim' People v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 12:00 am
In Shipyard Associates v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:08 am
But Judge Keith Rollins of the Douglasville Municipal Court found her in contempt of court and ordered her to serve 10 days in jail. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final… [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:49 pm
Sy v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:00 pm
On the other hand, a claim of a fraudulent transfer, at common law, is commonly addressed by a court of equity, see Smith v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:05 am
Smith [Continued from yesterday's Part 1.] [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:06 pm
In the case of Harris v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:00 pm
Smith v. [read post]
