Search for: "Smith v. Powers"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,883
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
They were very interested very early with Colt and Smith & Wesson. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
In the 2012 United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
That statute, 18 U.S.C. section 241, should not have been a surprise: it is a powerful and oft-used tool by prosecutors. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 2:23 pm
California (1973), though with extra detail added by Smith v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 2:32 pm
” (See Smith v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
Smith, 429 F.3d 706, 710 (7th Cir. 2005). [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
As I have argued before, this is a role that should be reinvigorated, particularly in the war powers context. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
Also on 21 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Smith v Backhouse [2023] EWCA Civ 874. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
Wise Smith & Assocs. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am
ADF UK reports that the Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole (BCP) Council has decided not to pursue Adam Smith-Connor for non-payment of a fine for praying silently near an abortion clinic in its area following the police’s assessment that praying silently was not an offence in England and submissions by his legal team that the state had no power to restrict thoughts directed towards God. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:38 am
Charging Trump under 18 USC § 241 would therefore be a straightforward and powerful way for Smith to proceed. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:37 am
Smith, 70 F.4th 198 (June 6, 2023). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:38 am
While Huawei v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
On 11 July 2023, the Court of Appeal heard an appeal over undertakings in the harassment case of Smith v Backhouse. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:28 pm
The Georgia Supreme Court, in Nunn v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
Evidentiary hurdles faced by the Select Committee have been overcome by Special Counsel Smith through the use of his more robust subpoena power and a series of court victories. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:05 pm
Cynthia Godsoe (Brooklyn Law School), Abbe Smith (Georgetown University Law Center), & Ellen Yaroshefsky (Hofstra University - Maurice A. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
This episode is a follow-up podcast to Episode 9, Epic v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
"The judicial Power shall extend to … Cases … [and] to Controversies …" US Constitution, Article III Sec. 2 We all know roughly what that means, right? [read post]
