Search for: "Smith v. Wilson" Results 161 - 180 of 468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2018, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Pimlico Plumbers Ltd & Anor v Smith, heard 20-21 Feb 2018. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 1:17 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Pimlico Plumbers Ltd & Anor v Smith, heard 20-21 Feb 2018. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 6:09 am
Miller (University of Iowa College of Law), on Monday, February 26, 2018 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Boards of Directors, Business judgment rule, Buyouts, Delaware law, DGCL Section 102, Director liability, Duty of care, Fiduciary duties, In re Revlon, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Smith v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Pimlico Plumbers Ltd & Anor v Smith, heard 20-21 Feb 2018. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog covers the terms of the settlement made in the case of Suresh v Samad [2017] EWHC 76 (QB) in light of the statement made in open court on 4 December 2017. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 7:35 am by Timothy B. Lee
But the government pointed to a 1979 Supreme Court ruling called Smith v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:24 am by Andrew Hamm
Smith … was turned down … because some time in the remote past he suffered from a venereal disease. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 3:00 am by INFORRM
The defence may be more likely to succeed when commenting on true facts; for example, “I found John Smith’s speech on the role of women in society to be both sexist and chauvinistic”. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “A “witness at a judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding enjoys an absolute privilege with respect to his or her testimony,” as long as the statements made are material to the issues to be resolved therein (Pfeiffer v Hoffman, 251 AD2d 94, 95 [1998]; accord Martinson v Blau, 292 AD2d 234, 235 [2002]; see Youmans v Smith, 153 NY 214, 219 [1897]; Wilson v Erra, 94 AD3d 756, 756-757 [2012]). [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:43 am by MOTP
Resolution Trust Corp., 837 S.W.2d 627, 628 (Tex. 1992); see Smith v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Hill, Megan Wilson reports on an amicus brief filed in Christie v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
  In fact, this is a well established procedures and such injunctions have been granted in cases such as Brett Wilson LLP v Persons Unknown [2015] EWHC 2628 (QB) and Smith v Unknown Defendant [2016] EWHC 1775 (QB). [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog has looked at what to do when revenge porn is uploaded to Facebook. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
Mills, Inc., 662 F.3d 423, 426 (7th Cir. 2011); see also Smith v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
Mills, Inc., 662 F.3d 423, 426 (7th Cir. 2011); see also Smith v. [read post]