Search for: "Sound Testing, Inc" Results 161 - 180 of 1,628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[FN6]The G&T test, the SHSAT, and other standardized admissions tests used in screened middle and high schools are, according to plaintiffs, "culturally biased" and not "pedagogically sound. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[FN6]The G&T test, the SHSAT, and other standardized admissions tests used in screened middle and high schools are, according to plaintiffs, "culturally biased" and not "pedagogically sound. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 7:54 am by Dave Abels
Others are undergoing a scheduled procedure or testing to help identify a problem or issue. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 7:54 am by Dave Abels
Others are undergoing a scheduled procedure or testing to help identify a problem or issue. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:01 am
The general test is whether the altered mark would have to be republished in order to fairly present the mark for purposes of opposition. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 8:08 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
Columbia Forest Productions, Inc, 340 Ore. 469 (Ore. 2005) Thus, while employers must consider the ADA and state laws in deciding whether to terminate an individual for a positive drug test, there are plenty of sound arguments supporting continued enforcement of drug-free workplace policies. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 8:07 pm by Russ
The sniff test is applied in the real world, too. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 2:34 am
New Product Makes Internally Tried and Tested Component Available for Use by Customers REDWOOD CITY, Calif. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:20 am
Cir. 2014), the Board noted that similarity of any one of “appearance, sound, connotation and commercial impression . . . may be sufficient to find the marks confusingly similar. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 4:35 am by Eric Guttag
” In fact, I agree with Judge Plager’s dissent in the denial of rehearing en banc in Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2017, 8:47 am by Gregory B. Williams
Plaintiff’s motion did not challenge the methodological soundness of cross-price elasticity and co-price movement; rather, it challenged the appropriateness of those tests under the facts and circumstances of the case. [read post]