Search for: "South Carolina v. Harry"
Results 161 - 180
of 189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 3:06 am
Harris.Of note for South Carolina, the article quotes John P. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
Allen argument 1/20/2010 South Carolina v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 9:07 am
LEXIS 26397 (D SC, March 19, 2010), a South Carolina federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2010 U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Charlotte Observer, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Co. has agreed to pay a $4 million penalty for a 2005 chlorine and diesel fuel spill that killed nine people and polluted a creek in western South Carolina, the federal government said Monday. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:22 pm
" While Club Forest appears to acknowledge Bi-Lo's claim that the lease does not contain an express "open for business" requirement, Club Forest asserts that South Carolina state law creates such an "open for business" requirement: Contrary to Debtors’ suggestion, South Carolina law is not to the effect that go-dark is permitted unless expressly prohibited. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
Honnold ; edited and updated by Harry M. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:11 am
(citing Harris v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
Harris Associates Docket: 08-586 Argument date: November 2, 2009 Question presented: Federal law imposes duties on investment managers regarding the funds they manage. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
' Court of Appeal rules... - Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:40 pm
Florida, being argued at 10, and Sullivan v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
Harris. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
In South Carolina v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 8:08 pm
Louisiana and South Carolina have 15. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
App. 1988); Harris v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 8:19 am
Today's case brief is of Harris v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 12:42 pm
Gallus v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 2:39 pm
South Carolina (07-8436) — was turned aside by the Justices last year. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
