Search for: "Sox v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2008, 5:47 am
United Space Alliance, LLC. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
In the 1770s, the colonies of what would later be known as the United States of America sought their freedom from England. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
(Afro-IP) Spain Decree 1431/2008 introduces important amendments to IPR application procedures in Spain (IPR Helpdesk) Tanzania Tanzania: IP overview (Afro-IP) Uganda Prof G Kakoma brings copyright infringement action against government for use of national anthem (Techdirt) (The IP Factor) (Afro-IP) United Kingdom Chartered Institute of Marketers says law restricting use of words associated with 2012 Olympic Games is… [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:00 pm
The Act disclaims the entities' status as an agency or establishment of the United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:00 pm
In addition to state standards and the requirements of SOX, the stock exchanges each have their own standards for independence. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 7:53 pm
United States(2007), which narrows the scope of qui tam claims by employee informants. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Indictment, United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
This need for government intervention to make the system work effectively ought to be a caution to those in favor of regulation lite in the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 12:32 am
-United States BranchU.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 5:33 am
HuffstetlerOn January 22, 2008, in Allen v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
King Billable Hour v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
By doing so, SOX specifically addresses conflicts that arise when one professional entity performs work for a client but also owes fiduciary duties to the investing public and company shareholders. [28] SOX intimidated KPMG into disbanding their global legal entity, KLegal, which employed mover than 3,000 lawyers in 60 countries. [29] However, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Deloitte & Touche, and Ernst & Young have no intentions of doing the same,… [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:36 am
This makes me believe that over time the common law/civil law distinction will be seen as a rather false one where instead you will find countries lumped into categories based on their ability to respond to local and changing conditions (even the United States, which in recent years may have created increased regulatory bottlenecks such as SOX). [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 5:15 am
See Beam v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 6:14 am
Southwest Sec., Inc., 2003-SOX-8 at 1 (Feb. 2, 2004); Moldauer v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 9:02 pm
While I hate the Red Sox (but ironically love the Celtics), it is true that the tradition of anonymous speech is older than the United States. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 5:15 am
Incorporated in Maryland but based in California, InfoSonics provides wireless handsets to Latin America and the United States. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 5:15 am
See Miller v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 12:54 am
Despite rulings like Columbia Pictures Industries v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 5:25 am
So, in US v. [read post]
