Search for: "Spears v. Spears" Results 161 - 180 of 532
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332.Supreme Court had concluded:1. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:31 am by Michael Risch
So, this study's assumption is that the filings of these words as trademarks are the tip of the spear. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332.Supreme Court had concluded:1. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 1:47 pm by INFORRM
On 23 November 2010, in the case of Lufti v Spears (BC 406904) The California Court of Appeals has rejected an appeal in a defamation claim brought against Britney Spears’ mother by the singer’s former manager, Sam Lufti arising out of a book entitled Through the Storm: A Real Story of Fame and Family in a Tabloid World. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Arizona 2014http://t.co/XRnRpuhMU8 -> Circumstantial evidence can be used to prove trade secret breach SPEAR MARKETING v BancorpSOUTH ND Tex 2014http://t.co/q1IQSHtfQP -> Apple iPhone 5 Facing Speech Recognition Patent Infringement Suit http://t.co/HpzDSD3oPs -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-07-21: Canada’s New Anti-Spam Law Will Change your Marketing http:/… http://t.co/0sQSKM4gEZ -> Another Blogger Wins a Fair Use Defense For a… [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 3:10 am
The court, citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NYPD 471, said, "[a]n arbitration award must be upheld when the arbitrator offer[s] even a barely colorable justification for the outcome reached. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:45 am
This shop sold cacti and associated plants under the name Prick (& the Britney Spears inspired company name Prick Me Baby One More Time).While cacti and tattoos are not often confused, the geographical proximity and similar names concerned Mr Martinez and led to a series of social media posts followed by the inevitable legal letter and claim: Martinez (t/a Prick) & Anor v Prick Me Baby One More Time Ltd (t/a Prick) & Anor [2018] EWHC 776 (IPEC).Some prickly issuesAt… [read post]