Search for: "Spies v. United States"
Results 161 - 173
of 173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
United States Postal Service, 2006 WL 2687019, *2 (D.D.C. 2006), aff'd No. 06-5321, 2007 U.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:16 am
Turkmen v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:31 am
DRC, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 11:35 pm
The Act defines "investigation business" as a business that, for a fee, reward, or other consideration, . . . accepts employment to furnish. . . or makes an investigation for the purpose of obtaining information with reference to any of the following: (i) Crimes or wrongs done or threatened against the United States or a state or territory of the United States, or any other person or legal entity. . . [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 2:00 am
– USB Overdrive X anti-piracy strategy (Techdirt) Pirates and IT (RelatIP) Global - Trade Marks ICANN plan for new TLDs comes under barrage of criticism (Ars Technica) OTX study ‘The Impact of Social Media on Purchasing Behaviour’ reveals consumers rely on social media websites as much as company websites for product and brand information (IP finance) Australia A battle of culture and copyright: Village Roadshow & Ors v iiNet… [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 1:57 pm
I have argued that the immunity grant appears constitutionally valid, at least as to a challenge under United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:06 am
Yet we have had to litigate the Al-Haramain case in the shadow of secrecy, where the government wants the case to die quietly — without a court ruling on whether the president of the United States has broken the law. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 9:25 am
It's a 74 page note by Anne Gilson LaLonde on the protection in the United States of foreign trade marks that are well known in the US but aren't actually being used there. [read post]
1 May 2008, 8:38 am
The precedent is United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Young Moon, appeals from her conviction and sentence entered by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee on April 25, 2006, for three counts of health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:30 am
The plaintiff's lawyer Jon Eisenberg tried to argue in August that since his clients knew they were spied on, all the court had to do was to decide whether spying inside the United States on Americans without getting warrants violated the law. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
Some highly experienced law of war experts inside the military would eventually conclude (following the "gap" argument about GC3 and GC4) that they should be treated instead as spies and saboteurs under GC4, but no one so far as I know suggested that they would be POWs, and the White House lawyers did not have the background knowledge really to understand that (the role of David Addington in this debate is unknown to me, but I do wonder). [read post]
