Search for: "Sprint Cell Phone" Results 161 - 180 of 380
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2012, 2:37 pm by Jon Brodkin
Cell phone makers are paying dearly for the right to patents covering "wireless e-mail" technology. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 3:30 am by David Kravets
The dumps provide to law enforcement any cell phone number that has pinged a tower in a given time frame. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 6:05 am by Jeffrey Brown
In July, Congressman Edward Markey (D-Mass.) requested figures from nine cell phone companies and revealed the information today.Markey, first elected to the House in 1976, said of the findings, "We cannot allow privacy protections to be swept aside with the sweeping nature of these information requests, especially for innocent consumers. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:40 am by Pat Murphy, Dolan Media Newswires
A $17.5 million class settlement did not adequately protect the rights of all cell phone customers who had claims against Sprint for allegedly unlawful early termination fees, the 3rd Circuit has ruled in reversing judgment. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:48 am by David Kravets
Law enforcement has been asking for so-called “cell tower dumps” in which carriers disclose all phone numbers that connected to a given tower during a certain period of time. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:59 am by Matt Murphy
Barton and all the phone companies that responded—AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, T-Mobile, MetroPCS, Cricket, U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:15 am by Gritsforbreakfast
" At a minimum, Grits thinks cell phone users should be notified when law enforcement access their personal data without probable cause. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 9:04 pm
§ 876(a)for Sprint cell phone records was a proper use of the subpoena power and violated no right of privacy. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:48 pm by Ross
It works with all cell carriers and all types of cell phones that have a voicemail plan – how’s that for inclusivity? [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 12:26 pm by David Kravets
When defeating California legislation that would force them to publicly report the number of times they turn over cell phone location information to police and federal agents, they successfully argued that such a plan would be too burdensome, and would take time away from the important work of sharing customer data with cops “day and night.” Meanwhile, the government continues to argue that it doesn’t need probable cause to track you via your phone,… [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 12:26 pm by David Kravets
When defeating California legislation that would force them to publicly report the number of times they turn over cell phone location information to police and federal agents, they successfully argued that such a plan would be too burdensome, and would take time away from the important work of sharing customer data with cops “day and night.” Meanwhile, the government continues to argue that it doesn’t need probable cause to track you via your phone,… [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 12:26 pm by David Kravets
When defeating California legislation that would force them to publicly report the number of times they turn over cell phone location information to police and federal agents, they successfully argued that such a plan would be too burdensome, and would take time away from the important work of sharing customer data with cops “day and night.” Meanwhile, the government continues to argue that it doesn’t need probable cause to track you via your phone,… [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 12:26 pm by David Kravets
When defeating California legislation that would force them to publicly report the number of times they turn over cell phone location information to police and federal agents, they successfully argued that such a plan would be too burdensome, and would take time away from the important work of sharing customer data with cops “day and night.” Meanwhile, the government continues to argue that it doesn’t need probable cause to track you via your phone,… [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:52 am by Susan Brenner
After being convicted by a jury of first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit murder, kidnapping and torture, Alison Lane Martin appealed. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:48 pm by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
Other than Sprint, we do not have even this type of basic information about the frequency of requests for any of the other cell phone companies. [read post]
18 May 2012, 5:02 am
Here, the Government had obtained an order from a state court judge which instructed Sprint to provide the location of the cell phone in question at any time for a period of sixty days. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:17 pm by Todd Ruger
Verizon stores the cell towers used by a mobile phone for “one rolling year;” T-Mobile USA keeps this information “officially 4-6 months, really a year or more;” Sprint and Nextel store this data for “18-24 months;” and AT&T/Cingular retains it “from July 2008. [read post]
3 May 2012, 3:05 am by Robert Kraft
” — Scott “I stuck a business card with my contact information on it in my mother’s cell phone case so if her Alzheimer’s causes her to get lost (or if she loses her cellphone), the card can be found and I can be reached.Hope this helps someone else. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 7:37 am by LaBovick Law
IRS whistleblower cases are complex, but by joining this case against Sprint and pushing the matter into the public eye, Schneiderman is accomplishing a lot for New York taxpayers, in addition to the potential collection of $300 million from the cell phone service provider. [read post]